Sudan crisis and subsequent potential disaster

Following the ousting of a long-reigning dictator, Sudan's movement of protest worries that the army will seize control.

Tough talk by the AU and US looks unlikely to dislodge Sudan's military junta
Tough talk by the AU and US looks unlikely to dislodge Sudan's military junta

Masses of demonstrators calling for a fresh age of wealth and accountability in Sudan celebrated earlier this year as army armies overthrew Omar al-Bashir, the long-ruling dictator of the country. But the collapse of Bashir did not ensure liberty or democracy, and Sudan and its 40 million individuals are now in danger of falling into the grip of a crisis that threatens to ruin what protesters have accomplished and plunge the nation into brutal confrontation.

The prospect of a change to a civilian state has been substituted in latest decades by the concern that the safety armies will murder demonstrators in an effort to hold on to authority. Militias have suffered terrible abuses of freedoms, officials have cut off internet access throughout the nation in an effort to stifle dissent, and international forces seem determined to preserve military rule.

Mass violence in previous weeks and a volatile political condition have resulted to global fear that Sudan might fall apart, with distinct groups of the safety forces battling each other for command and rampant violence against people. Sudan is now stuck between stable democracy movement and further crimes.

Sudan’s Omar al-Bashir was ousted in April, but security forces have remained in power amid civil protests.

Sudan’s anti-government demonstrations started to gain traction last December, as protests over food prices transformed into a broader movement against the 30-year dictatorship of Bashir.

After a bloodless coup d’état in 1989, Bashir seized authority and has since ravaged Sudan and destabilized the wider region. He harbored Islamist terrorists in the 1990s, including Osama bin Laden; waged a long conflict in the south of the country; and recently sent child soldiers to fight in the conflict in Yemen in Saudi Arabia. In 2009, the International Criminal Court granted a warrant for war crimes against Bashir and genocide for his part in the violence that ravaged the Darfur region of Sudan.

The June 3 assault derailed talks and hopes for a peaceful transfer to civilian rule. Demonstrators held discussions and started mass strikes in the decades that followed, while the assault brought the African Union’s global TMC recognition and Sudan’s suspension. Once again, during the strike, security troops resorted to shooting live ammunition and tear gas, murdering several more protesters this week.

Protests against the military rule in Sudan have emerged since Omar al-Bashir’s ouster, calling on a transition to a civilian government.

While the internet stays cut off and the potential for further violence stays high, some positive signs have been seen in latest days. During the June 3 assault, the TMC acknowledged abusses of freedoms, while demonstrators called off a strike to start peace discussions with officials. Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed of Ethiopia has assumed a leading position in trying to broker a deal.

Meanwhile, the U.S. has been extremely slow to get interested in the Sudan crisis, pointing to the wider absence of involvement with African politics under the administration of President Donald Trump as part of the State Department. The U.S. has no embassy to Sudan and only this week did the State Department appoint a unique representative to the nation— a normal role in past administrations.

“The U.S. was exceptionally absent,” said Boswell.

Protesters also started gathering again, headed by local neighborhood councils who manage to arrange protests despite the absence of internet access. How officials react to the renewed call for a civilian state will check whether Sudan can move forward or whether there is still more violence to come.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here