Indian son, 27, sue his parents because he didn’t CONSENT for his birth

0
13

Raphael Samuel, 27, plans to sue his parents because they gave birth to him without his consent.

“I want to tell all Indian kids that they don’t owe their parents anything,” he told ThePrint. “I love my parents, and we have a great relationship, but they had me for their joy and their pleasure. My life has been amazing, but I don’t see why I should put another life through the rigamarole of school and finding a career, especially when they didn’t ask to exist, Other Indian people must know that it is an option not to have children, and to ask your parents for an explanation as to why they gave birth to you” Samuel term — anti-natalism to the print.

According to “child-free” believes, the best way to ease the strain on Earth is to stop delivering children to birth to suffer life.

However, anti-natalists like Samuel have a positive disposition towards children or life. Their concept is simple, life can be brought into world only when its consest is given first. In other words, no one has the right to give birth to a child unless he agrees first to be born & subject to ife’s difficulties.

Samuel is part of a growing tribe of ‘child-free’ proponents — who sometimes also call themselves Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (VHEM) activists and ‘efilists’ — who believe children should not be brought into the world.

‘Stop Making Babies’ until it decides on an official name” has big dreams To set up a national-level organisation that works on spreading awareness about child-free living.

Nearly 400 people follows Samuel’s anti-natalist page Several others like ‘Childfree by Choice INDIA’ and ‘Childfree by Choice’ also have a following that page owners say is picking up.